40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-188.64%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BTE at -811.55%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.84%
Some yoy growth while BTE is negative at -962.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-15.09%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BTE at -93.40%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-53.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BTE at -305.28%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-342.86%
AR is negative yoy while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BTE at -337.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-24.19%
Negative yoy while BTE is 388.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.99%
Some CFO growth while BTE is negative at -55.94%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-72.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -71.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-99.23%
Negative yoy acquisition while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
1080.00%
Purchases growth of 1080.00% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
72.20%
Liquidation growth of 72.20% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-47.32%
We reduce yoy other investing while BTE is 110.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-129.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -54.01%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
98.87%
We repay more while BTE is negative at -0.04%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-84.91%
Negative yoy issuance while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.