PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
253.38%
Net income growth above 1.5x BTE's 103.09%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.63%
Some D&A expansion while BTE is negative at -87.18%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-50.59%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BTE stands at 91.97%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-48.89%
Negative yoy SBC while BTE is 1234.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-73.91%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BTE is 113.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
202.94%
AR growth of 202.94% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.00%
Negative yoy usage while BTE is 111.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-97.87%
Both negative yoy, with BTE at -87.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-46.73%
Negative yoy CFO while BTE is 106.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-13.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -139.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-637.50%
Negative yoy acquisition while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
714.29%
Purchases growth of 714.29% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-84.42%
We reduce yoy sales while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-32.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -62.08%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-57.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -258.46%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
5.88%
We repay more while BTE is negative at -19.43%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.