PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
165.94%
Some net income increase while BTE is negative at -182.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.17%
Less D&A growth vs. BTE's 30.56%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-98.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BTE stands at 77.34%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-132.14%
Negative yoy SBC while BTE is 35.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
87.10%
Less working capital growth vs. BTE's 217.15%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
97.78%
AR growth of 97.78% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.43%
Negative yoy usage while BTE is 217.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-228.57%
Negative yoy while BTE is 31.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.25%
Some CFO growth while BTE is negative at -9.04%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
0.20%
Some CapEx rise while BTE is negative at -4.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-22.73%
Negative yoy acquisition while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
100.00%
Liquidation growth of 100.00% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
95.09%
Growth well above BTE's 66.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-2.58%
We reduce yoy invests while BTE stands at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-4.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -195700.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.