PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2541.03%
Some net income increase while BTE is negative at -943.56%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.29%
Negative yoy D&A while BTE is 194.80%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
2283.33%
Some yoy growth while BTE is negative at -1025.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-624.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BTE at -36.99%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-85.30%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BTE is 6254.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
125.00%
AR growth of 125.00% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.67%
Negative yoy usage while BTE is 6254.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-478.95%
Negative yoy while BTE is 206.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-36.84%
Negative yoy CFO while BTE is 9.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
33.27%
Some CapEx rise while BTE is negative at -31.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
4388.89%
Acquisition growth of 4388.89% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1500.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -173.01%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
86.02%
We have mild expansions while BTE is negative at -236.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
4.35%
Debt repayment well below BTE's 42.43%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.