PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.82%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CNQ at -10.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.87%
Less D&A growth vs. CNQ's 28.59%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
176.39%
Well above CNQ's 168.42% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.16%
Slight usage while CNQ is negative at -378.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.16%
Growth of 245.16% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-843.75%
Negative yoy while CNQ is 70.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
38.84%
Some CFO growth while CNQ is negative at -12.50%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-5.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while CNQ is 1.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
103.70%
Acquisition growth of 103.70% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-266.67%
Negative yoy purchasing while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
5.63%
Liquidation growth of 5.63% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-2.44%
We reduce yoy other investing while CNQ is 115.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-4.25%
We reduce yoy invests while CNQ stands at 17.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-40.24%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.