PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-962.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CNQ at -121.04%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.33%
Less D&A growth vs. CNQ's 77.57%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-813.33%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
94.64%
SBC growth well above CNQ's 144.44%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
95.74%
Slight usage while CNQ is negative at -108.86%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.74%
Some yoy usage while CNQ is negative at -108.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
214.46%
Well above CNQ's 62.89%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
84.67%
Some CFO growth while CNQ is negative at -45.90%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.12%
Lower CapEx growth vs. CNQ's 39.56%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
113.94%
Acquisition growth of 113.94% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.12%
Negative yoy purchasing while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-40.95%
We reduce yoy sales while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
13.68%
We have some outflow growth while CNQ is negative at -1128.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
104.06%
Investing outflow well above CNQ's 8.17%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
94.52%
We repay more while CNQ is negative at -4285.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.