PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.68%
Some net income increase while CNQ is negative at -60.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-15.45%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CNQ at -21.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
6.23%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. CNQ's 287.23%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
366.67%
SBC growth while CNQ is negative at -223.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
1933.33%
Slight usage while CNQ is negative at -1200.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1933.33%
Some yoy usage while CNQ is negative at -1200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-38.95%
Negative yoy while CNQ is 111.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-38.17%
Negative yoy CFO while CNQ is 2.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-0.95%
Negative yoy CapEx while CNQ is 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-83.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-116.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while CNQ stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
442.34%
Liquidation growth of 442.34% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
0.99%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CNQ's 49.38%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-354.10%
We reduce yoy invests while CNQ stands at 21.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1508.54%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CNQ is 49.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.