40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.49%
Net income growth under 50% of CNQ's 218.02%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-21.59%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CNQ at -9.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
35.94%
Some yoy growth while CNQ is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
80.00%
Less SBC growth vs. CNQ's 164.37%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-42.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CNQ is 159.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.00%
Negative yoy usage while CNQ is 159.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
256.67%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. CNQ's 49300.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-1.10%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with CNQ at -7.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
40.80%
CapEx growth well above CNQ's 5.98%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
668.69%
Acquisition growth of 668.69% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-10.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-40.80%
We reduce yoy sales while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
40.59%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CNQ's 1161.90%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
153.68%
Investing outflow well above CNQ's 26.36%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-4166.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CNQ is 78.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.