40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
152.75%
Net income growth above 1.5x CNQ's 3.83%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-20.00%
Negative yoy D&A while CNQ is 4.91%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
116.70%
Well above CNQ's 142.86% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
82.76%
SBC growth while CNQ is negative at -39.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
36.17%
Less working capital growth vs. CNQ's 92.63%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
247.37%
AR growth of 247.37% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.17%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CNQ's 92.63%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
34.78%
Some yoy increase while CNQ is negative at -1900.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
124.10%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x CNQ's 25.38%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
4.65%
CapEx growth well above CNQ's 3.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
104100.00%
Acquisition growth of 104100.00% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
91.07%
Purchases growth of 91.07% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-4.65%
We reduce yoy sales while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
4.65%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CNQ's 367.53%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
405.15%
Investing outflow well above CNQ's 27.31%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-457.20%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CNQ is 53.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.