PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-200.00%
Negative net income growth while CNQ stands at 68.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
9.09%
Some D&A expansion while CNQ is negative at -18.60%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-200.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CNQ stands at 18.98%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
533.33%
SBC growth well above CNQ's 298.86%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-1225.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CNQ at -124.26%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-7000.00%
AR is negative yoy while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
700.00%
Some yoy usage while CNQ is negative at -124.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
211.11%
Well above CNQ's 125.58%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
24.67%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x CNQ's 5.83%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-17.13%
Negative yoy CapEx while CNQ is 4.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
170.59%
Acquisition growth of 170.59% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
520.00%
Growth well above CNQ's 46.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
13.95%
Investing outflow well above CNQ's 16.87%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-4.55%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CNQ is 11.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.82%
Buyback growth of 19.82% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.