40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-166.34%
Negative net income growth while CNQ stands at 12.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.97%
Less D&A growth vs. CNQ's 4.17%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
98.45%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. CNQ's 514.29%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-9.09%
Negative yoy SBC while CNQ is 6.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
138.60%
Slight usage while CNQ is negative at -1270.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
42.17%
AR growth of 42.17% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-120.00%
Negative yoy inventory while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-37.70%
Negative yoy AP while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
338.89%
Some yoy usage while CNQ is negative at -1270.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
3010.00%
Well above CNQ's 145.11%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-9.31%
Negative yoy CFO while CNQ is 15.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-9.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with CNQ at -68.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
102000.00%
Acquisition growth of 102000.00% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-350.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while CNQ is 489.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
276.95%
We have mild expansions while CNQ is negative at -10.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-144.72%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CNQ is 1.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.