40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
49.12%
Net income growth above 1.5x CNQ's 32.13%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CNQ at -2.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-79.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CNQ stands at 633.33%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with CNQ at -253.85%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
1185.19%
Slight usage while CNQ is negative at -232.04%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
7.94%
AR growth of 7.94% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
26.41%
Some yoy usage while CNQ is negative at -232.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1749.16%
Some yoy increase while CNQ is negative at -110.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
1.38%
Some CFO growth while CNQ is negative at -26.49%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.29%
CapEx growth well above CNQ's 16.78%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
238.11%
Growth well above CNQ's 141.94%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
18.24%
We have mild expansions while CNQ is negative at -25.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-86.82%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CNQ is 91.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.41%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x CNQ's 2.76%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.