PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2541.03%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x CRK's 1753.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-0.29%
Negative yoy D&A while CRK is 243.66%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
2283.33%
Well above CRK's 455.59% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-624.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with CRK at -41.25%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-85.30%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CRK is 185.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
125.00%
AR growth well above CRK's 60.89%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.67%
Negative yoy usage while CRK is 3084.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-478.95%
Both negative yoy, with CRK at -907.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-36.84%
Negative yoy CFO while CRK is 4106.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
33.27%
CapEx growth well above CRK's 27.49%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
4388.89%
Acquisition growth of 4388.89% while CRK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1500.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while CRK is 1073.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
86.02%
Investing outflow well above CRK's 163.59%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
4.35%
Debt repayment well below CRK's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to CRK's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.