PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
31.29%
Net income growth under 50% of EQT's 75.35%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.89%
D&A growth well above EQT's 12.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-0.42%
Negative yoy deferred tax while EQT stands at 8732.03%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-400.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -86.46%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -506.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-5042.90%
Negative yoy while EQT is 153.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-29.47%
Negative yoy CFO while EQT is 161.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-25.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -10.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.03%
We reduce yoy other investing while EQT is 58098.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-72.10%
We reduce yoy invests while EQT stands at 61.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.15%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
132.61%
Issuance growth of 132.61% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
68.97%
We have some buyback growth while EQT is negative at -1.14%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.