40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
56.44%
Some net income increase while EQT is negative at -72.73%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-5.86%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 0.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
26.83%
Well above EQT's 10.16% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-211.41%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -304.45%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.11%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. EQT's 97.67%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
32.55%
Some CFO growth while EQT is negative at -249.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
5.61%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -21.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.11%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. EQT's 11226.25%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
92.75%
Investing outflow well above EQT's 74.51%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
68.49%
Debt repayment growth of 68.49% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-31.09%
Negative yoy issuance while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
103.42%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x EQT's 45.87%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.