PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2316.00%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x EQT's 1803.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-24.50%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-345.92%
Negative yoy deferred tax while EQT stands at 1074.21%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-146.05%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -591.90%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy usage while EQT is negative at -454.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
4147.62%
Well above EQT's 32.82%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-48.46%
Negative yoy CFO while EQT is 104.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
38.21%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -66.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-84.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
157.62%
Growth of 157.62% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
155.57%
We have mild expansions while EQT is negative at -72.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
52.77%
We repay more while EQT is negative at -35.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-50.00%
Negative yoy issuance while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.