PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
212.67%
Net income growth above 1.5x EQT's 21.74%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-0.49%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with EQT at -11.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
382.89%
Well above EQT's 101.30% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.37%
Slight usage while EQT is negative at -92.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.57%
Some yoy usage while EQT is negative at -57.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
6.84%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. EQT's 14893.44%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
48.38%
Some CFO growth while EQT is negative at -28.18%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-15.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -11.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
5.77%
Acquisition growth of 5.77% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
224.47%
Purchases growth of 224.47% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
15.78%
Liquidation growth of 15.78% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-18.37%
We reduce yoy other investing while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
0.47%
We have mild expansions while EQT is negative at -11.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.