40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-107.38%
Negative net income growth while EQT stands at 100.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.99%
Less D&A growth vs. EQT's 18.58%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-125.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while EQT stands at 66.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.96%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -651.14%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.96%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -47.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
183.36%
Well above EQT's 10.26%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-30.64%
Negative yoy CFO while EQT is 16.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.31%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -14.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-292.73%
Negative yoy acquisition while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with EQT at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
97.30%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. EQT's 646.45%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-44.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -10.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.