40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
125.64%
Some net income increase while EQT is negative at -28.22%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.16%
Some D&A expansion while EQT is negative at -20.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
7.46%
Some yoy growth while EQT is negative at -53.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.49%
Less working capital growth vs. EQT's 315.27%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.49%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. EQT's 142.91%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-129.91%
Negative yoy while EQT is 93.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
52.13%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x EQT's 3.32%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
12.91%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -6.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-182.44%
Negative yoy acquisition while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
131.88%
Purchases growth of 131.88% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-12.91%
We reduce yoy sales while EQT is 13.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.41%
We have some outflow growth while EQT is negative at -98.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1.11%
We have mild expansions while EQT is negative at -6662.94%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
4.08%
Debt repayment growth of 4.08% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.