40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
93.57%
Net income growth above 1.5x EQT's 53.19%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-1.55%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with EQT at -23.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
53.71%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. EQT's 755.49%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-209.09%
Both cut yoy SBC, with EQT at -0.34%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-100.41%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -273.43%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.41%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -219.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
1740.00%
Well above EQT's 82.15%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-37.22%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with EQT at -40.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-0.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -4.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
4380.65%
Some acquisitions while EQT is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
151.67%
Purchases growth of 151.67% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
0.13%
Liquidation growth of 0.13% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-0.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -2722.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
167.36%
We have mild expansions while EQT is negative at -4.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -1944.36%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.