40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-74.25%
Negative net income growth while EQT stands at 9.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.52%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 4.19%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
94.57%
Some yoy growth while EQT is negative at -267.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
350.00%
SBC growth while EQT is negative at -43.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
470.37%
Less working capital growth vs. EQT's 944.36%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
470.37%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. EQT's 3044.99%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
268.18%
Some yoy increase while EQT is negative at -116.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
68.77%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x EQT's 31.19%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-0.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while EQT is 9.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-83.65%
Negative yoy acquisition while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
3013.64%
Purchases growth of 3013.64% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-91.24%
We reduce yoy sales while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.68%
We have some outflow growth while EQT is negative at -1.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-43.80%
We reduce yoy invests while EQT stands at 9.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to EQT's 97.67%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.