PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-233.51%
Negative net income growth while EQT stands at 28.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
370.00%
Well above EQT's 297.37% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
46.67%
SBC growth well above EQT's 61.09%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-161.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -141.08%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-161.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -142.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-10.81%
Both negative yoy, with EQT at -7364.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-50.59%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with EQT at -51.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-11.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -19.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
41.18%
Acquisition growth of 41.18% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
11.86%
Purchases growth of 11.86% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
16.07%
Liquidation growth of 16.07% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-10.17%
We reduce yoy other investing while EQT is 7963.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6.51%
We reduce yoy invests while EQT stands at 148.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.