40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
142.24%
Some net income increase while EQT is negative at -34.45%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-4.31%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
2466.67%
Some yoy growth while EQT is negative at -136.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-13.64%
Both cut yoy SBC, with EQT at -16.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
183.80%
Less working capital growth vs. EQT's 530.85%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.80%
Growth well above EQT's 307.06%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-12.28%
Both negative yoy, with EQT at -303.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-18.66%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with EQT at -27.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-9.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -39.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-2816.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-112.13%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
1373.68%
Liquidation growth of 1373.68% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-52.56%
We reduce yoy other investing while EQT is 31.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-233.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -108.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
68.51%
We repay more while EQT is negative at -3686.68%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.