PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
907.47%
Some net income increase while EQT is negative at -4.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
19.00%
D&A growth well above EQT's 11.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
63.96%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. EQT's 252.47%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-123.68%
Negative yoy SBC while EQT is 29.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
30.25%
Slight usage while EQT is negative at -89.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.25%
Some yoy usage while EQT is negative at -35.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-196.00%
Negative yoy while EQT is 44.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.26%
Negative yoy CFO while EQT is 4.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-6.79%
Negative yoy CapEx while EQT is 14.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
740.95%
Acquisition growth of 740.95% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
1064.52%
Purchases growth of 1064.52% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-79.82%
We reduce yoy sales while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
37.16%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. EQT's 101.25%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
355.54%
Investing outflow well above EQT's 42.94%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
92.80%
We repay more while EQT is negative at -177.49%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.