40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.23%
Net income growth under 50% of EQT's 57.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-10.66%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 5.80%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
36.21%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. EQT's 170.95%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-350.00%
Negative yoy SBC while EQT is 1.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-9.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -182.72%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -480.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-151.72%
Both negative yoy, with EQT at -1262.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
52.01%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x EQT's 20.34%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
36.34%
CapEx growth well above EQT's 16.58%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-29.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -458.98%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-40.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-36.34%
We reduce yoy sales while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
32.43%
We have some outflow growth while EQT is negative at -458.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.12%
Investing outflow well above EQT's 11.19%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
98.86%
We repay more while EQT is negative at -142.48%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.