PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
165.94%
Some net income increase while EQT is negative at -204.76%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.17%
D&A growth well above EQT's 24.22%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-98.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while EQT stands at 71.11%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-132.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with EQT at -91.17%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
87.10%
Well above EQT's 99.79% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
97.78%
AR growth well above EQT's 185.47%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.43%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -47.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-228.57%
Negative yoy while EQT is 2331.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.25%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of EQT's 112.14%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
0.20%
Lower CapEx growth vs. EQT's 6.86%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-22.73%
Negative yoy acquisition while EQT stands at 92.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
100.00%
Liquidation growth of 100.00% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
95.09%
Growth well above EQT's 60.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-2.58%
We reduce yoy invests while EQT stands at 64.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-4.76%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EQT is 62.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.