40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-104.03%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with EQT at -225.99%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.94%
Some D&A expansion while EQT is negative at -2.49%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-204.55%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
800.00%
SBC growth while EQT is negative at -91.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-34.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -1344.97%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-213.11%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with EQT at -284.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -712.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-58.82%
Negative yoy while EQT is 385.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-3.44%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with EQT at -31.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-1.41%
Negative yoy CapEx while EQT is 29.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-85.62%
Negative yoy acquisition while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.24%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. EQT's 751.72%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-5.16%
We reduce yoy invests while EQT stands at 29.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
51.16%
Debt repayment above 1.5x EQT's 17.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to EQT's 99.82%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.