PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
65.30%
Some net income increase while EQT is negative at -128.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-17.65%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 6.25%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-114.24%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while EQT is 106.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
219.33%
Slight usage while EQT is negative at -148.75%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-13.33%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with EQT at -216.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.33%
Some yoy usage while EQT is negative at -951.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
321.37%
Some CFO growth while EQT is negative at -58.72%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-39.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -7.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
442.86%
Acquisition growth of 442.86% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
229.04%
Purchases growth of 229.04% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-73.02%
We reduce yoy sales while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-39.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -97.69%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
52.61%
We have mild expansions while EQT is negative at -88.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-383.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EQT is 33.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.