PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
64.88%
Some net income increase while EQT is negative at -111.37%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-4.50%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 15.70%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
421.91%
Some yoy growth while EQT is negative at -89.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while EQT is 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-204.55%
Negative yoy working capital usage while EQT is 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
79.53%
AR growth while EQT is negative at -2386.30%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above EQT's 47.96%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-88.18%
Negative yoy AP while EQT is 3083.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-153.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -81.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-96.95%
Negative yoy while EQT is 100.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
8.27%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of EQT's 10.65%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
4.70%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -8.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -286.98%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
108.57%
Growth well above EQT's 104.07%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-164.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -143.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
56.01%
We repay more while EQT is negative at -101.49%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.