40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.01%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with EQT at -105.48%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-23.63%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 10181.30%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-26.56%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
253.33%
SBC growth well above EQT's 6.93%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-35.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while EQT is 77.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-34.13%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with EQT at -85.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
19.05%
Inventory growth of 19.05% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
44.37%
AP growth well above EQT's 74.04%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-35.14%
Negative yoy usage while EQT is 90.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
124.07%
Some yoy increase while EQT is negative at -61.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-22.19%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with EQT at -73.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-4.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -0.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1249.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -2203.53%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.85%
Growth well above EQT's 105.63%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-248.55%
We reduce yoy invests while EQT stands at 5.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
98.59%
We repay more while EQT is negative at -279.06%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.76%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of EQT's 100.00%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.