40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
226.57%
Some net income increase while OBE is negative at -0.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-48.89%
Negative yoy D&A while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1240.68%
Some yoy growth while OBE is negative at -14.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.30%
Slight usage while OBE is negative at -174.14%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy usage while OBE is negative at -174.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-23.02%
Both negative yoy, with OBE at -113.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
21.05%
Some CFO growth while OBE is negative at -42.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
18.58%
Lower CapEx growth vs. OBE's 68.69%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-155.78%
Negative yoy acquisition while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
168.74%
Purchases growth of 168.74% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-162.53%
We reduce yoy sales while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-157.56%
We reduce yoy other investing while OBE is 393.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
365.10%
Investing outflow well above OBE's 214.02%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
17.77%
We repay more while OBE is negative at -1020.86%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
227.31%
Issuance growth of 227.31% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-186831.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -281.25%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.