PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-109.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with OBE at -0.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
94.22%
D&A growth of 94.22% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-154.57%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26204.46%
Slight usage while OBE is negative at -174.14%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
410.20%
Some yoy increase while OBE is negative at -113.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
50.48%
Some CFO growth while OBE is negative at -42.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-63.46%
Negative yoy CapEx while OBE is 68.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
483.85%
Liquidation growth of 483.85% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
175.26%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. OBE's 393.81%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-303.68%
We reduce yoy invests while OBE stands at 214.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
95.25%
We repay more while OBE is negative at -1020.86%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
3.88%
Issuance growth of 3.88% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
1.88%
We have some buyback growth while OBE is negative at -281.25%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.