40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
212.67%
Some net income increase while OBE is negative at -112.82%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.49%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with OBE at -24.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
382.89%
Well above OBE's 225.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.37%
Less working capital growth vs. OBE's 552.94%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.57%
Growth of 159.57% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
6.84%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. OBE's 427.45%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
48.38%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 38.75%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-15.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -4.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
5.77%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. OBE's 22.16%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
224.47%
Purchases growth of 224.47% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
15.78%
Liquidation growth of 15.78% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-18.37%
We reduce yoy other investing while OBE is 75.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
0.47%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. OBE's 92.22%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -95.96%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.