40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
125.64%
Some net income increase while OBE is negative at -6.87%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.16%
Less D&A growth vs. OBE's 25.91%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
7.46%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. OBE's 127.92%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.49%
Slight usage while OBE is negative at -38.54%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.49%
Growth of 61.49% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-129.91%
Both negative yoy, with OBE at -482.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
52.13%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x OBE's 6.25%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
12.91%
Lower CapEx growth vs. OBE's 42.07%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-182.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -525.93%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
131.88%
Purchases growth of 131.88% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-12.91%
We reduce yoy sales while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.41%
We have some outflow growth while OBE is negative at -21.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1.11%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. OBE's 10.67%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
4.08%
We repay more while OBE is negative at -800.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.