PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
269.37%
Net income growth above 1.5x OBE's 58.76%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-0.25%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with OBE at -26.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-267.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OBE stands at 76.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-146.15%
Negative yoy SBC while OBE is 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
62.33%
Slight usage while OBE is negative at -1128.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.33%
Some yoy usage while OBE is negative at -1128.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-10.00%
Negative yoy while OBE is 4471.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
63.91%
Some CFO growth while OBE is negative at -22.27%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
10.63%
Lower CapEx growth vs. OBE's 73.77%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
262.79%
Acquisition growth of 262.79% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-103.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
317.65%
Liquidation growth of 317.65% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
5.77%
We have some outflow growth while OBE is negative at -407.41%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.04%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. OBE's 51.25%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
50.00%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of OBE's 97.94%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.