40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
146.22%
Net income growth above 1.5x OBE's 86.81%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.73%
Some D&A expansion while OBE is negative at -65.76%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-55.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OBE stands at 111.16%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
100.00%
SBC growth of 100.00% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
22.40%
Slight usage while OBE is negative at -126.36%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.40%
Some yoy usage while OBE is negative at -126.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
72.73%
Some yoy increase while OBE is negative at -102.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
104.11%
Some CFO growth while OBE is negative at -29.48%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
28.73%
CapEx growth well above OBE's 1.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-66.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-28.73%
Negative yoy purchasing while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-41.54%
We reduce yoy sales while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
26.70%
We have some outflow growth while OBE is negative at -61.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
19.78%
We have mild expansions while OBE is negative at -99.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-57.23%
We cut debt repayment yoy while OBE is 70.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.