40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
165.94%
Some net income increase while OBE is negative at -12.07%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.17%
Some D&A expansion while OBE is negative at -16.09%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-98.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OBE stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-132.14%
Negative yoy SBC while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
87.10%
Less working capital growth vs. OBE's 346.15%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
97.78%
AR growth of 97.78% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.43%
Negative yoy usage while OBE is 346.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-228.57%
Negative yoy while OBE is 1200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.25%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of OBE's 714.29%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
0.20%
Some CapEx rise while OBE is negative at -66.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-22.73%
Negative yoy acquisition while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
100.00%
Liquidation growth of 100.00% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
95.09%
We have some outflow growth while OBE is negative at -103.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-2.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -916.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-4.76%
We cut debt repayment yoy while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.