40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-55.65%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 82.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.44%
Some D&A expansion while OBE is negative at -71.14%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-72.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
105.88%
SBC growth of 105.88% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-172.73%
Negative yoy working capital usage while OBE is 140.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
207.02%
AR growth of 207.02% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-172.73%
Negative yoy usage while OBE is 140.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
29.17%
Some yoy increase while OBE is negative at -75.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-16.56%
Negative yoy CFO while OBE is 1166.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.53%
Some CapEx rise while OBE is negative at -237.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
1073.33%
Acquisition growth of 1073.33% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-373.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-373.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while OBE is 333.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
29.31%
Investing outflow well above OBE's 7.14%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
91.75%
Debt repayment above 1.5x OBE's 37.04%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.56%
Buyback growth of 66.56% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.