40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-63.52%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with OBE at -95.17%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
30.00%
Less D&A growth vs. OBE's 145.02%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
128.44%
Well above OBE's 103.94% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-129.41%
Negative yoy SBC while OBE is 90.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
4540.00%
Slight usage while OBE is negative at -131.58%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
694.58%
AR growth of 694.58% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-862.36%
Negative yoy inventory while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-232.88%
Negative yoy AP while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
4540.00%
Some yoy usage while OBE is negative at -131.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
92.42%
Well above OBE's 95.10%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
22.06%
Some CFO growth while OBE is negative at -42.61%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-70.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -10.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
26.38%
Acquisition growth of 26.38% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-414.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-46.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -10.46%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-7000.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while OBE is 96.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.13%
We cut yoy buybacks while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.