PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
293.08%
Some net income increase while PR is negative at -46.96%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
185.71%
Some yoy growth while PR is negative at -38.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Less working capital growth vs. PR's 482.21%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth while PR is negative at -34.52%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above PR's 163.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while PR is 285.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-100.00%
Negative yoy CFO while PR is 15.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
15.56%
CapEx growth of 15.56% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while PR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
37.65%
We have mild expansions while PR is negative at -210.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.