40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.52%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PR at -46.96%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
4.52%
D&A growth well above PR's 6.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-32.86%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1999.85%
Well above PR's 482.21% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1999.85%
Growth well above PR's 163.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-206.74%
Negative yoy while PR is 285.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-32.85%
Negative yoy CFO while PR is 15.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
15.48%
CapEx growth of 15.48% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
206.97%
Growth well above PR's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
194.71%
We have mild expansions while PR is negative at -210.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
46.76%
Debt repayment growth of 46.76% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
114.50%
Stock issuance far above PR's 80.95%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-44431.11%
We cut yoy buybacks while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.