40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.22%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PR at -46.96%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
10.34%
D&A growth well above PR's 6.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-173.24%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.47%
Less working capital growth vs. PR's 482.21%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.47%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PR's 163.70%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
123.72%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PR's 285.30%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
12.92%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of PR's 15.66%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-19.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while PR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-105.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -210.47%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
32.90%
Debt repayment growth of 32.90% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
95.48%
Stock issuance far above PR's 80.95%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
12.03%
Buyback growth of 12.03% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.