PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-134.19%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PR at -46.96%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.75%
Less D&A growth vs. PR's 6.79%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-82.16%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.45%
Less working capital growth vs. PR's 482.21%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.34%
Growth well above PR's 163.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-1545.00%
Negative yoy while PR is 285.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
215.67%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PR's 15.66%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-16.70%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
42.47%
Acquisition growth of 42.47% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
23.58%
Purchases growth of 23.58% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
16.70%
Liquidation growth of 16.70% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-11.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while PR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-3.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -210.47%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-75.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PR is 80.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
44.06%
Buyback growth of 44.06% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.