PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
212.67%
Some net income increase while PR is negative at -46.96%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.49%
Negative yoy D&A while PR is 6.79%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
382.89%
Some yoy growth while PR is negative at -38.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.37%
Less working capital growth vs. PR's 482.21%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.57%
Growth well above PR's 163.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
6.84%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PR's 285.30%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
48.38%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PR's 15.66%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-15.78%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
5.77%
Acquisition growth of 5.77% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
224.47%
Purchases growth of 224.47% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
15.78%
Liquidation growth of 15.78% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-18.37%
We reduce yoy other investing while PR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
0.47%
We have mild expansions while PR is negative at -210.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PR is 80.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.