PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
125.64%
Some net income increase while PR is negative at -46.96%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.16%
D&A growth well above PR's 6.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
7.46%
Some yoy growth while PR is negative at -38.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.49%
Less working capital growth vs. PR's 482.21%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.49%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PR's 163.70%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-129.91%
Negative yoy while PR is 285.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
52.13%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PR's 15.66%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
12.91%
CapEx growth of 12.91% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-182.44%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
131.88%
Purchases growth of 131.88% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-12.91%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.41%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PR's 100.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
1.11%
We have mild expansions while PR is negative at -210.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
4.08%
Debt repayment growth of 4.08% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PR is 80.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.