PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.82%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PR at -46.96%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.87%
Less D&A growth vs. PR's 6.79%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
176.39%
Some yoy growth while PR is negative at -38.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.16%
Well above PR's 482.21% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.16%
Growth well above PR's 163.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-843.75%
Negative yoy while PR is 285.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
38.84%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PR's 15.66%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-5.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
103.70%
Acquisition growth of 103.70% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-266.67%
Negative yoy purchasing while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
5.63%
Liquidation growth of 5.63% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-2.44%
We reduce yoy other investing while PR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-4.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -210.47%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-40.24%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.