PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
907.47%
Net income growth above 1.5x PR's 366.89%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
19.00%
Less D&A growth vs. PR's 105.82%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
63.96%
Deferred tax of 63.96% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-123.68%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
30.25%
Slight usage while PR is negative at -286.78%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.25%
Some yoy usage while PR is negative at -201.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-196.00%
Both negative yoy, with PR at -300.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.26%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PR at -19.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-6.79%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 10.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
740.95%
Acquisition growth of 740.95% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
1064.52%
Purchases growth of 1064.52% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-79.82%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
37.16%
We have some outflow growth while PR is negative at -90.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
355.54%
We have mild expansions while PR is negative at -371.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
92.80%
Debt repayment growth of 92.80% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.