40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-93.01%
Negative net income growth while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-5.25%
Negative yoy D&A while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-73.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-522.22%
Negative yoy SBC while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-190.97%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.97%
Negative yoy usage while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-72.92%
Negative yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-62.50%
Negative yoy CFO while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-43.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-243.86%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.31%
Purchases growth of 43.31% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
105.31%
Liquidation growth of 105.31% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-68.17%
We reduce yoy other investing while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-273.43%
We reduce yoy invests while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-8211.11%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.