40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-23.20%
Negative net income growth while PR stands at 116.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.21%
Less D&A growth vs. PR's 32.13%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-66.67%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PR stands at 90.58%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-230.43%
Negative yoy SBC while PR is 14.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
19.38%
Less working capital growth vs. PR's 185.59%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-52.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PR at -24.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.57%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PR's 154.97%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-2600.00%
Both negative yoy, with PR at -96.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
105.66%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PR's 283.89%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-4.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -394.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
286.05%
Acquisition growth of 286.05% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
4.01%
Purchases growth of 4.01% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-56.36%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-4.01%
We reduce yoy other investing while PR is 103.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
19.64%
We have mild expansions while PR is negative at -404.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.