40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.18%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PR at -29.91%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.81%
Less D&A growth vs. PR's 23.17%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
1521.43%
Well above PR's 2122.85% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
303.33%
SBC growth well above PR's 28.14%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
175.97%
Slight usage while PR is negative at -306.32%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-203.03%
AR is negative yoy while PR is 33.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.48%
Some yoy usage while PR is negative at -6156.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
332.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PR's 22200.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
63.76%
Some CFO growth while PR is negative at -40.44%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-13.98%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 65.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
678.75%
Acquisition growth of 678.75% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.98%
Purchases growth of 13.98% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-41.67%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-13.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -99.46%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
152.73%
Investing outflow well above PR's 65.50%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
12.50%
Debt repayment well below PR's 33.33%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.